In 2018, when Bitcoin was buying and selling round $4,000 and most People, at the very least, thought cryptocurrency was a fad, Katie Haun discovered herself on a debate stage in Mexico Metropolis reverse Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist. As Krugman targeted on Bitcoin’s wild worth swings, Haun steered the dialog towards one thing else — stablecoins.
“Stablecoins are actually attention-grabbing and actually vital to this ecosystem to hedge towards that volatility,” she argued on stage, explaining how digital tokens pegged to the U.S. greenback might provide the advantages of blockchain know-how with out the ups and downs of conventional cryptocurrencies.
Krugman dismissed the thought fully.
It wasn’t precisely a turning level in Haun’s profession, nevertheless it was one second amongst others which have helped outline it. A former federal prosecutor, Haun brings an uncommon background to crypto investing, having spent over a decade investigating monetary crimes and creating the federal government’s first cryptocurrency activity power. After changing into the primary feminine associate at Andreessen Horowitz in 2018 and co-leading its crypto funds, she based Haun Ventures in 2022 with over $1.5 billion in property beneath administration.
Hanging her personal shingle hasn’t been with out its complexities. Regardless of her function at a16z and the trade connections that got here with it, the 2 haven’t publicly co-invested in something since shortly after she launched her fund, and Haun stepped down from Coinbase’s board final yr whereas Marc Andreessen stays a director.
When requested Wednesday evening at TechCrunch’s StrictlyVC occasion about her relationship with Andreessen Horowitz, she downplayed any potential friction whereas acknowledging they aren’t collaborators precisely. “There’s no ‘gentleman’s settlement,’” she mentioned, echoing this editor’s query about whether or not there’s any understanding to keep away from competing along with her former employer. “In reality, I nonetheless speak to Andreessen Horowitz. You’re proper that we haven’t actually finished any offers collectively of late.”
The obvious lack of co-investment might mirror the cutthroat trade or the challenges related to leaving one in all Silicon Valley’s most distinguished corporations to compete straight with former colleagues. Regardless of the case, Haun is now charting her personal course, and on the coronary heart of it’s stablecoins, that are cryptocurrencies designed to keep up a steady worth by being pegged to conventional property just like the U.S. greenback.
Not like Bitcoin or Ethereum, which might swing wildly in worth, stablecoins like Circle’s USDC or Tether’s USDT are supposed to commerce at precisely $1, making a digital illustration of conventional foreign money that may transfer on blockchain networks.
Certainly, fast-forward to as we speak, and Haun’s perception in stablecoins seems more and more prescient. Stablecoins — which barely existed in 2015 — now symbolize 1 / 4 of a trillion {dollars} in worth. They’ve develop into the 14th largest holder of U.S. Treasuries globally. Reportedly, for the primary time final yr, stablecoin transaction quantity exceeded Visa’s.
“I feel individuals who checked out stablecoins a couple of years in the past thought, what’s the worth prop?” Haun mentioned Wednesday evening. “You’ve requested me this earlier than. You mentioned, ‘Why do I want stablecoins?’ And I mentioned, “I confer with this as an ‘If it really works for me, it really works for everybody’ drawback.”
In actuality, for many People, the present monetary system works fairly effectively. We’ve got Venmo, financial institution accounts, bank cards. However Haun, drawing on her prosecutor’s understanding of worldwide monetary techniques, says she has lengthy been conscious that the U.S. expertise isn’t common.
In nations with unstable currencies or restricted banking infrastructure, stablecoins provide one thing distinctive, she argues, which is immediate entry to steady, dollar-denominated worth that may be despatched wherever on the earth for pennies. “Individuals in Turkey don’t consider Tether as a cryptocurrency,” she mentioned Wednesday, “They consider Tether as cash.”
The know-how has developed dramatically since these early debates, definitely. Stablecoins as soon as value $12 to ship internationally. And Circle says its USDC stablecoin is totally backed one-to-one by {dollars} held in JP Morgan financial institution accounts and audited by Massive 4 accounting corporations.
Little surprise the company world is taking discover in a giant means. Walmart and Amazon are reportedly exploring stablecoins, as are different goliaths like Uber, Apple, and Airbnb. The reason being easy economics. Stablecoins present a solution to transfer the worth of U.S. {dollars} utilizing cryptocurrency rails as an alternative of conventional banking infrastructure, doubtlessly saving these retail-heavy corporations billions in processing charges.
However the shift has critics nervous about economic chaos. Whereas Circle and Tether are dedicated to having sufficient reserves to assist their tokens, not like conventional banks, there’s no insured authorities safety behind these reserves. Relatedly, if main firms can subject their very own currencies, what occurs to financial coverage and banking regulation?
The considerations run deeper than simply financial disruption. Not all stablecoins are created equal, and plenty of lack the backing and oversight that corporations like Circle present. Whereas well-regulated stablecoins like USDC are backed by precise {dollars} in U.S. Treasury securities, others function with much less transparency or depend on complicated algorithmic mechanisms which have confirmed weak to break down. (TerraUSD has had probably the most specular crash so far, wiping out $60 billion in worth when it nosedived.)
Corruption considerations particularly got here into sharp focus lately when President Donald Trump’s household issued its personal stablecoin, a transfer that highlighted potential conflicts of curiosity in an trade the place political affect can straight influence market worth and regulatory outcomes.
These considerations got here to a head as Congress debated the GENIUS Act, laws that might create a federal framework for stablecoin regulation. The invoice passed the Senate early final week with bipartisan assist, with 14 Democrats crossing get together strains to assist it. It now awaits a Home vote earlier than doubtlessly reaching the president’s desk.
However Senator Elizabeth Warren, the rating member on the Senate Banking Committee, has been notably vocal in her opposition, calling the laws a “superhighway for Donald Trump’s corruption.” Her criticism facilities on a notable hole within the invoice: whereas it prohibits members of Congress and senior government department officers from issuing stablecoin merchandise, it says nothing about their members of the family.
Requested about Warren’s considerations on Wednesday evening, Haun virtually rolled her eyes. “I feel it’s actually ironic that Elizabeth Warren or different Democrats who do name this corruption usually are not working to go crypto laws,” she mentioned. “Had there been guidelines of the highway in place [already], there would have been a framework, there would have been clear guidelines for what’s a safety, what’s a commodity, and what are the buyer protections round that.”
Haun, whose enterprise capital agency has made quite a few stablecoin investments together with Bridge (acquired by Stripe for reportedly 10 instances ahead income), is basically supportive of the laws, unsurprisingly. However she had one notable criticism when requested what she doesn’t like about it: the invoice’s prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins.
“I’m unsure that yield-bearing stablecoins are a good suggestion for customers within the U.S., however I’m unsure {that a} prohibition is a good suggestion,” she instructed StrictlyVC attendees. The problem comes right down to who earnings from the curiosity earned on stablecoin reserves. At present, that cash goes to corporations like Circle and Coinbase. However Haun wonders why customers shouldn’t get that yield, similar to they might with a financial savings account.
“In case you had a financial savings account or checking account and also you’re getting yield on that, you’re getting curiosity,” she defined. “What in case you simply mentioned, ‘No, the financial institution will get curiosity, not you,’ they usually’re lending out your cash?”
Haun was much less nuanced relating to one other Warren concern: that if the GENIUS Act is signed into regulation, stablecoins might develop into a car for cash laundering and terrorism financing.
“Criminals are nice beta testers of all applied sciences,” mentioned Haun. “However this know-how is very traceable, far more traceable than money. The most important felony instrument is the greenback invoice.” (In response to Haun, the Treasury Division has testified that 99.9% of cash laundering crimes succeed utilizing conventional financial institution wires, not cryptocurrency.)
In the meantime, she mentioned, the regulatory readability that laws just like the GENIUS Act offers might truly make the system safer by distinguishing between official, well-backed stablecoins from extra experimental or dangerous variants.
In reality, because the stablecoin ecosystem continues to mature, Haun sees even larger modifications forward. She envisions a future the place all types of property — from cash market funds to actual property to personal credit score — get “tokenized” and made obtainable 24/7 to world markets.
“It’s only a digital illustration of a bodily asset,” she explains. “BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, they’ve already tokenized their cash market funds. That’s already occurred.”
In response to Haun, tokenized property might democratize entry to investments in methods just like how Netflix democratized leisure. As a substitute of getting to be rich sufficient to satisfy minimal funding thresholds, somebody with $25 and a smartphone might purchase fractional possession in a share of Apple or Amazon, for instance.
“Simply because one thing’s inevitable doesn’t imply it’s imminent,” Haun mentioned on Wednesday. However she’s assured the transformation is coming, pushed by the identical forces that made stablecoins profitable: they’re sooner, cheaper, and, she insists, extra accessible than conventional options.
Trying again at that 2018 debate with Krugman, Haun’s persistence appears to have paid off. A significant query now isn’t whether or not digital {dollars} will reshape the monetary system however maybe extra importantly, whether or not regulators can preserve tempo with the know-how whereas addressing official considerations about corruption, client safety, and monetary stability.
Haun doesn’t appear involved. Whereas critics level to the truth that stablecoins symbolize simply 2% of worldwide funds, questioning their product-market match, Haun bats away that concern, too. As a substitute, she sees this as a well-recognized tech adoption story — one which has performed out repeatedly and sometimes takes longer than folks initially think about.
“We expect it’s actually early days,” she instructed the gang.
In case you’re curious to study extra about what Haun needed to say this previous week, you possibly can take a look at our full dialog under:
